Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of Mead
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Coady, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Foxley Cattle Company, a partnership and cattle feeding operation, sued the defendant, Bank of Mead, a banking corporation, on the theory that the president of the Bank of Mead made misleading statements, or misrepresented facts, and plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for damages in the sum of $227,850.71. The trial judge, after hearing and the taking of evidence, awarded prejudgment interest in the sum of $95,808.43. We affirm the total judgment of $323,659.14.
The evidence is summarized in this and the following five paragraphs. The United States National…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Abbott v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Nathan v. McKernanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- SWANSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. CumberlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cao v. Huan NguyenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Omaha National Bank v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Bank of Mead v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Lucky 7, LLC v. Tht Realty, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.