Legal Opinion

Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of Mead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1976No. 40227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Coady, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Foxley Cattle Company, a partnership and cattle feeding operation, sued the defendant, Bank of Mead, a banking corporation, on the theory that the president of the Bank of Mead made misleading statements, or misrepresented facts, and plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for damages in the sum of $227,850.71. The trial judge, after hearing and the taking of evidence, awarded prejudgment interest in the sum of $95,808.43. We affirm the total judgment of $323,659.14.

The evidence is summarized in this and the following five paragraphs. The United States National…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Abbott v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Nathan v. McKernanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. SWANSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. CumberlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cao v. Huan NguyenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Omaha National Bank v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bank of Mead v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lucky 7, LLC v. Tht Realty, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API