Legal Opinion

Brown v. Rudolph

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1934No. Docket No. 9138PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of a trust clause of a will.

Mary C. Hamon, the testatrix, died in September, 1927, survived by seven adult children, a son and six daughters, one of whom was Edith I. Brown, the wife of appellant. The will provided first that all real property belonging to the estate be sold. The testatrix then bequeathed to six of her children, not including Mrs. Brown, a one-seventh interest each in her estate; and the remaining one-seventh, over which this controversy arises, she disposed of as follows: “Third: I give, devise and bequeath to Paul Rudolph, of San…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Vries v. De VriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Estate of RitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Steele v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anglo California National Bank v. KiddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Kinsell v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Estate of WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API