Legal Opinion

In Re McKenzie

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1995No. 67843PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Judge.

Appellant, Antonio McKenzie, is appealing the trial court’s journal entry finding him delinquent and committing him to the Ohio Department of Youth Services. Appellant contends the trial court’s acceptance of his admission to the amended complaint was in violation of Juv.R. 29 and appellant’s constitutional rights. For the following reasons, we reverse and vacate the admission and the commitment, and remand.

The complaint against appellant alleged that he had received a stolen automobile, a third-degree felony. On the record, the prosecutor stated that after discussing the matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. CaudillOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re BeechlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re NicholsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re WestOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re HendricksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Tabler, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API