Legal Opinion

Huske Hardware House v. Percival

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Was tbe letter of 23 November, 1929, sufficient “notice” to tbe owner to support a lien upon ber land?

A lien upon a building is a creature of statute, and the right thereto is based upon notice to the owner before settlement is made. The nature of the notice contemplated by the pertinent statutes is described in Construction Co. v. Journal, 198 N. C., 273, 151 S. E., 631. The Court, after referring to certain decisions upon the subject, declared: “These decisions, in substance, require that the notice or itemized statement must be filed in detail, specifying the materials furnished or labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grier-Lowrance Construction Co. v. Winston-Salem Journal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Beeson Hardware Co. v. BurtnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Bain v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Economy Pumps, Inc. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API