Legal Opinion

Hill v. Garvey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1922No. Civ. No. 3727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to enforce rescission of a lease of real property. On the eleventh day of June, 1919, the plaintiffs executed a lease in writing to the defendant of the said real property for the purpose of obtaining oil therefrom. In October, 1919, plaintiffs served upon the defendant a notice of rescission, and thereafter, on November 13, 1919, commenced this action, wherein they claim that the lease was obtained from them by means of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendant, and believed and relied upon by the plaintiffs, whereby they were induced to execute the lease, and without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Carr v. Sacramento Clay Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Cooke v. DarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API