Legal Opinion

Vaci v. Swedish American Line

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1961No. 201 of 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, Senior District Judge.

Libellant, Irma Vaci, brought this suit for alleged injuries received November 29, 1959, while a passenger aboard the M/S Stockholm. She claims wages and maintenance and cure, in addition to normal consequential damages. She alleges that the respondent is Swedish American Line, 1 a corporation having its principal place of business in New York City, New York, at 636 Fifth Avenue, Rockefeller Center. It is further alleged that said respondent owned, operated, possessed and controlled the M/S Stockholm at all times pertinent to the suit. Suit was filed on May 16,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scheibel v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Mulvihill v. Furness, Withy & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Barrette v. Home Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Toohill v. Cunard Steamship Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kendall v. American Hawaii CruisesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989
  2. Cygielman v. Cunard Line Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Ager v. D/S A/S Den Norske Afrika-Og Austraeielinie Wilhelmsens DampskibsaktieselskabDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  4. Talton v. United States Lines CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Valenti v. Home Lines Cruises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API