Legal Opinion
Kendall v. American Hawaii Cruises
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 24, 1989No. Civ. 87-0890 HMFPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FONG, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant American Hawaii Cruises’ present motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for separate trial raises significant concerns of notice for all persons who travel upon common carriers. Specifically, defendant now asks the court to bar plaintiffs’ claim for negligence by enforcing a contractual time limitation clause for filing such law suits which deeply is imbedded in its cruise ship tickets. Hearing on this matter was held on November 21, 1988; Timothy P. McNulty appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Richards v. Neilsen Freight LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carmen J. Jimenez v. Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Corna v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
- Debra Ward v. Cross Sound FerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.