Legal Opinion

Lund v. Hall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1997No. 950248Published

1Opinion of the Court

938 P.2d 285 (1997)

Rallet C. LUND, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Elton W. HALL, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 950248.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 2, 1997.

Jackson Howard and Leslie W. Slaugh, Provo, for plaintiff and appellant.[1]

Ray Phillips Ivie, Jeffery C. Peatross, and David N. Mortensen, Provo, for defendant and appellee.

RUSSON, Justice:

Plaintiff Rallet C. Lund appeals from a trial court order denying her motion for relief from summary judgment under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. In denying her motion for relief, the trial court held that Lund's complaint was filed after the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Howe; Concurrence · Durham.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seeley v. Expert, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Byrne v. OgleAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rice v. Granite School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Vaughn v. DeitzTexas Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API