Legal Opinion

State v. Tioran

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 8321SC147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The principal question we decide in this appeal is whether a defendant charged with death by vehicle under G.S. § 20-141.4 1 may assert the intervening negligence of another as a defense. We answer that question in the affirmative and order a new trial.

In the case now before us, defendant requested the trial court to instruct the jury on intervening negligence. His request was refused. Defendant contends that the theory of his defense was that the negligence of William Merryman intervened between defendant’s negligence and the fatal collision, so as to insulate defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ElkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hester v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Davis v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Field v. Sheriff of Wake County, NCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
  4. Tabor v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API