Legal Opinion

United States v. Max Spatig

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2017No. 15-30322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

As the saying goes, fences make good neighbors. But when the neighbor collects thousands of containers of hazardous and combustible chemicals in his yard -that could explode at any moment, a fence may not be enough to save the neighborly relationship. Instead, the authorities need to get involved.

Max Spatig was charged and convicted under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) for storing more than 3,000 containers of hazardous waste in his yard without a permit; On appeal, Spatig challenges the district court’s refusal to allow evidence of his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SablanSuperior Court of Guam · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API