United States v. Max Spatig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
As the saying goes, fences make good neighbors. But when the neighbor collects thousands of containers of hazardous and combustible chemicals in his yard -that could explode at any moment, a fence may not be enough to save the neighborly relationship. Instead, the authorities need to get involved.
Max Spatig was charged and convicted under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) for storing more than 3,000 containers of hazardous waste in his yard without a permit; On appeal, Spatig challenges the district court’s refusal to allow evidence of his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SablanSuperior Court of Guam · 2018