Legal Opinion

State v. Langmayer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 2010No. 091789DV; A142787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175. At sentencing, the court initially gave him the option of taking a nonmandatory, non-Measure 11 sentence with the condition that he have no contact with his wife, the victim, or, in the alternative, to take a Measure 11 sentence without a no-contact condition. After a colloquy with the victim, however, the court stated that it was imposing the non-Measure 11 sentence with the “no contact” recommendation. The actual judgment document nonetheless imposes the Measure 11 sentence and also contains the following notation:

“Sentenc…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BlaylockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API