Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1994No. 93-1028; CA A79579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the sentence imposed after he was convicted of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.225; ORS 164.415. At sentencing, the trial court imposed a condition of incarceration and stated that it would recommend conditions of post-prison supervision to the Parole Board. The judgment, however, imposes conditions of post-prison supervision and makes no recommendations. Defendant argues that the incarceration and post-prison supervision conditions are error, because they may be imposed only by the Department of Corrections, not by the sentencing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. KelseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LangmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API