Legal Opinion

Oakland-Alameda County Builders' Exchange v. F. P. Lathrop Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1971No. S.F. 22763PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on the pleadings rendered in favor of defendant in their action for declaratory relief and damages for breach of the rules of a bid depository. We here determine whether certain of the rules of the bid depository constitute per se violations of the antitrust law of California.

Bid depositories are creations of the construction industry, generally established by construction trades subcontractors to control the process of submitting subbids to general contractors who are bidding on large construction jobs. The operation of a typical bid…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API