Legal Opinion
The Perth Amboy
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 9, 1931No. Nos. 253, 310PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
On December 24,1929, the barge Rockhaven, carrying a cargo of copper concentrates and crude ore, was stranded while being towed through Arthur Kill by the steam tug Perth Amboy. Libels, to recover resultant damages, have been brought by the owner of the barge and by the owner of the cargo against the Perth Amboy. The two causes were tried together.
Statement of Facts.
The barge Roekhaven, carrying about 1,-330 long tons of copper concentrates and crude ore, was bound on a voyage from Maine to Chrome, N. J., which lies near the southerly end of Arthur Kill, west of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dahlmer v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- Kenny v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- The Mabey and CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co. v. MylroieSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Petition of Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- The AnacondaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Mid-America Transportation Co. v. Rose Barge Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
- Brown v. Reading Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934