United States v. Root
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
Defendant Thomas Root moves this Court for a judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial following convictions for conspiracy to defraud the United States and for tax evasion. For the following reasons, the Court denies his motions.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual background
Because the Court is tasked with reviewing the jury’s verdict, the following facts are viewed in a light most favorable to the Government. See, e.g., United States v. Frorup, 963 F.2d 41, 42 (3d Cir.1992).
1. Defendant’s Reading Broadcasting, Inc.-related income
In the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. ManfrediDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- United States v. RootCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RootCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009