Legal Opinion

Kentucky v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 30, 1992No. 91-1516CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1), (4). The issues to be resolved are 1) whether a Memorandum of Understanding between the Army Corps of Engineers and the Commonwealth of Kentucky, acting through its agency the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, setting forth the rights and duties of each party pending divestiture of certain locks and dams on the Kentucky River contains the requisite elements…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schuerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Thermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Navajo Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Garza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API