Legal Opinion

Hincks v. Converse

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1886No. 9625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Bightor, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Watkins, J

The plaintiffs, as commissioners of the Workingmen’s Bank, claim to represent the successors and assigns of the Workingmen’s Accommodation Bank and the individual members thereof, and to be éntitled to recover of defendants $11,373.78, on the bond of Converse.

They aver that there were certain informalities in the act of incorporation of the Workingmen’s Accommodation Bank, and that the individual members thereof and their assigns, incorporated said banking-association under the name and style of the Workingmen’s Bank, and that said act of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Southern Wood Distillates & Fiber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Berlier v. AP Green Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Green v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Steeg v. CodiferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Werhan v. HelisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API