Legal Opinion

Foster v. Washington

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1958No. 20975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This is a suit on a promissory note for $1,200. The defense is that there has been a failure of consideration since the contemplated work for which the note was given has never been performed.

It is conceded that the work was not performed and that if the note were still owned by the contractor to whom it was given, there could be no recovery under it, but it is contended by the plaintiff who sues on the note that he is a third holder for value who obtained it before maturity and without knowledge of any of its possible infirmities.

There was judgment in the Civil District Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bernard Brothers v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Steeg v. CodiferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Appalachian Corp. v. AyoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Commercial Germania Trust & Savings Bank v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eskew v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Jefferson Securities Corp. v. WalshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Liberal Finance Westwego, Inc. v. HaughtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rein v. MerriellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API