Legal Opinion
Works v. Selby
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided November 19, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On bill for specific performance.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, V. C.
This is a suit to enforce the specific performance of a contract. In March, 1893, Edwin Lister executed a ten years’ lease to the defendant company of a plot of land adjoining the company’s works in Newark. The lease contains the following clause:
“The party of the first part [Lister] * * * does grant, demise and to farm let unto the said party of the second part the property or grounds now occupied by the buildings of the said party of the second part, and used for the manufacture of fertilizer, glue, &e., * * with privilege of purchase at the expiration of the lease at a fair…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Murray v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Van Rensselaer's Heirs v. PennimanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Enyeart v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Bi-Spool Sewing Machine Co. v. Acme Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kipp v. LaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Rosenberg v. D. Kaltman & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Iback v. Elevator Supplies Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Stedman v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950