Legal Opinion

Stedman v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1950No. [No. 160, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.

Harry Stedman and Emma Stedman, his wife, prior to November 9, 1944, owned in fee simple by the entire-ties, a property in Ridgely, Caroline County, Maryland, where they for some fifteen or sixteen years conducted a grocery, provisions and meat store. They wanted to sell it. William G. Hill decided to go in business, and the Stedmans and Hill met and discussed the matter of Hill taking over the store. The result was that on November 9, 1944, a “Contract and Agreement of Sale” was reduced to writing and signed by them. The provisions of this contract, which are of interest here, are: 1. That…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coe v. . HobbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Van Rensselaer's Heirs v. PennimanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Gostin v. NeedleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Schaeffer v. BilgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buckley Bros. Motors, Inc. v. Gran Prix Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Prevas v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. District of Columbia v. SuydamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Caplan v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Sales v. ColeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API