Legal Opinion

Perry v. Ponder

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 19, 1980No. 20240PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

This child support and custody suit was dismissed by the trial court for lack of personal jurisdiction over the father, a resident of Alabama. The court found that the father did not have those “minimum contacts” with the state of Texas required by due process. Insofar as the petition seeks to impose a personal obligation of support on the father, we affirm, but insofar as it seeks appointment of the mother as managing conservator, we reverse on the ground that since the child and the mother were residents of Texas at the time the suit was filed, the court should not…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S.A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Mask, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  3. In Re Guardianship of Cantu De Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  4. Quenzer v. QuenzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bartsch v. BartschSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API