Legal Opinion
Bartsch v. Bartsch
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 15, 2001No. 00-0068PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
Nathan Bartsch, a nonresident of Iowa, appeared specially in an Iowa domestic-abuse case under Iowa Code chapter 236 (1999) to challenge the court’s personal jurisdiction over him. The court agreed it did not have personal jurisdiction but concluded that, for purposes of entering a protective order under chapter 236, personal jurisdiction was not required. The court also denied Nathan’s motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens. We agree and therefore affirm.
I.Facts and Prior Proceedings.
Tara Bartsch filed an application for a protective order against Nathan Bartsch in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Teri Root v. Talton ToneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- D.A. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Caplan v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- C. Paige Hinkson v. Stuart StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.