Legal Opinion
In the Interest of S.A.V.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1992No. D-0599PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Justice.
This case involves complex jurisdictional issues arising from a Texas trial court’s modification of a Minnesota divorce decree. We must decide whether the Texas court could exercise jurisdiction to modify the decree with respect to four areas: child support, visitation expense, custody, and actual visitation arrangements. The court of appeals determined that the Texas court could exercise jurisdiction to modify child support and visitation expense but that the Texas court could not exercise jurisdiction to modify custody or visitation. 798 S.W.2d 293. Because we hold that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Dawson-Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Angelou v. African Overseas Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- CMMC v. SalinasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Vosko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.