Legal Opinion

Erickson Ex Rel. Wightman v. Gundersen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 10, 1994No. 93-1015PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.

We are asked in this case to decide several issues arising out of a cross-claim filed by the Gundersen Clinic against the Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, both of whom were parties to a medical malpractice action commenced on behalf of Chad Erickson, who was severely injured while undergoing surgery at the Clinic.

I. Issues and Decision

Some background is necessary. Section 655.23(4), STATS., requires health care providers to carry primary liability coverage of at least $400,000 for each occurrence, or to be responsible for that amount under a self-insurance plan. Under the statutory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prosser v. LeuckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Teff v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Majorowicz v. Allied Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Patients Compensation Fund v. Lutheran Hospital-LaCrosse, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Patients Compensation Fund v. Lutheran Hospital-LaCrosse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API