Legal Opinion

David S. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 22, 2007No. Nos. 05-956T, 05-971T, 06-285TPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.

This case, before the court after trial, arises from the failure of individual and corporate taxpayers to report one consistent value for almost 10 million shares of restricted stock issued in February 2000 to plaintiffs-counterdefendants David S. Litman and Malia A. Litman (collectively, the “Litmans”) and Robert B. Diener and Michelle S. Diener (collectively, the “Dieners”).1 Messrs. Lit-*92man and Diener are the founders of Hotels.com, Inc. & Subsidiaries’s two predecessor companies, TMF, Inc. (“TMF”) and HRN Marketing Corp. (“HRN Marketing”).

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. GushlakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Boynes v. Transportation Services of St. John, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Bear Stearns Asset ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API