Legal Opinion
People v. Rosen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1993PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*241OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
A defendant in a criminal trial who has exercised the right to self-representation may not be arbitrarily and categorically excluded from sidebar conferences. That having occurred here, a new trial is necessary.
Defendant Louis Rosen, along with nine others, was indicted on charges of conspiracy, grand larceny and other felonies arising out of a complex scheme to defraud investors through the sale of real estate limited partnership tax shelters. The evidence at trial revealed that 2,400 investors lost an aggregate of $152 million and that four financial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. AguileraNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. Baghai-KermaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- United States v. David Bruce McDermott IICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- People v. SchoolfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.