Decker v. Perry
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County; George Puterbaugh, Judge. Action by Uri Decker against Wesley Perry for money had and received. Demurrer -to complaint overruled and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
VANCLIEF, C.
The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and, upon failure of defendant to answer, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll, and presents the question whether or not the demurrer was properly overruled.
The object of the action is to recover from the defendant $5.02, alleged to have been unlawfully assessed to plaintiff on his land by the ‘‘ Otay Irrigation District, ’ ’ and paid by plain*489tiff to defendant…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meek v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Dear v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Judah v. FredericksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Bank of Woodland v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Guy v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.