Erickson v. Paterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Polk, county, Mills, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendant for a return of the grain in controversy, and assessing its-value át $250.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
On the 2d day of April, 1890, one Dunlava recovered a judgment against Ivor Erickson, the husband of plaintiff, for $117.75, which was duly rendered and docketed in the county of' Polk on that day. The judgment debtor was then occupying and in possession of the N. W. J of section 15, town 147, range 40, which he had duly entered and claimed as a homestead, and made due and. *526final proof of bis right thereto on the 24th day of June, 1890, and then became entitled to receive a patent therefor. On the same day he transferred and conveyed the land to his wife, this plaintiff, without…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Sparrow v. PondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Vought v. KanneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Kammrath v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Kirkeby v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Simanek v. NemetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.