Legal Opinion

Krasniqi v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 19, 2016No. 15-cv-7899 (KBF); 10-cr-464 (KBF); 15-cv-7898 (KBF); 10-cr-464 (KBF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge

The Court has reviewed the motions, through counsel, of petitioners Bruno Krasniqi and Saimir Krasniqi (collectively “Petitioners” or the “Krasniqis”) to vacate, set aside, or correct their sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. (Pet., 10-cr-464; 15-cv-7898, ECF No. 6; 15-CV-7899, ECF No. 6.)1 Petitioners—who are brothers—were convicted after a five-week jury trial of. all of the crimes with which each was charged. Those charges included, inter alia, racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
  2. Delva v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Fay v. AnnucciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Hilario-Bello v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. May v. GriffinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API