Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Cantu, Michael Neil Emigh, and David Edward Michaud

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1974No. 73-2963PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

The defendants-appellants, Juan Cantu, Michael Neil Emigh, and David Edward Michaud, appeal from their convictions of possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U. S.C. § 841(a)(1). All three contend that the search during which the marijuana was seized violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment. We conclude, however, that the search was valid under the pre-Almeida-Sanchez “border search” doctrine. 1 Appellants Emigh and Michaud contend that the evidence was insufficient to support a conclusion that they were ever in possession of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Earl E. Vick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. Richard McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Charles Spencer Haerr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Edward HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Kenneth LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Joseph Duckett, A/K/A Feton SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Ruben Garza LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Adan Serna TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API