United States v. Juan Cantu, Michael Neil Emigh, and David Edward Michaud
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
The defendants-appellants, Juan Cantu, Michael Neil Emigh, and David Edward Michaud, appeal from their convictions of possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U. S.C. § 841(a)(1). All three contend that the search during which the marijuana was seized violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment. We conclude, however, that the search was valid under the pre-Almeida-Sanchez “border search” doctrine. 1 Appellants Emigh and Michaud contend that the evidence was insufficient to support a conclusion that they were ever in possession of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Earl E. Vick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Richard McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Charles Spencer Haerr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Lawrence Edward HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Kenneth LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Joseph Duckett, A/K/A Feton SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Ruben Garza LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Adan Serna TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.