Legal Opinion

United States v. Adolph G. Sutro, Adolph G. Sutro, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1956No. 14588_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

In 1946, Sutro bought certain farm lands riparian to Pilgrim Creek. Before that time, the government had constructed a sewage disposal plant for Camp Pendleton, the effluents of which were deposited in the stream until 1952. Pilgrim Creek became so polluted that it was not fit for the irrigation of lands used for growing of vegetables intended for human consumption.

The cause was tried by a court without a jury under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. It was found that the employees of the government were negligent in operating the sewage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Taylor v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wells v. Lloyd IVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Barnes v. BerendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Williams v. BagnelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Harue HayashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Chun v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Builders Corporation of America, a Corporation, and Herlong Sierra Homes, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Mrs. W. E. (Ethel) Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Peter Buchanan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API