Legal Opinion

Nassif v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1964No. 3405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

In a trial without a jury appellant was found guilty on a charge of indecent exposure. After the government had pre-' sented its case, which consisted of the testimony of the arresting officer, appellant’s counsel announced that he would call a Mrs. Rodriguez as a witness for appellant. At this point the court stated: “If the defendant is going to testify, I want him to testify before this witness.’’ Counsel replied that appellant might not testify, saying: “I actually haven’t made up my mind as to that at this time.” The court then stated: “I will not permit you to call her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Clemons v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Coupe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Coombs v. CoombsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Hampton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Nassif v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API