Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1969No. 4658PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of simple assault 1 and sentenced to imprisonment for ninety days. Sentence was thereupon suspended and appellant was placed on probation for six months. The sole question presented is the propriety of a ruling by the court below which resulted in appellant’s exclusion from the courtroom while defense witnesses were testifying at his trial. We hold this ruling was prejudicial error and we reverse.

At the outset of the defendant’s case, the following colloquy occurred:

“Mr. Perazich: As our first witness the defense would…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Winestock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Quarles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API