Legal Opinion

United States v. Ryder

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 30, 1990No. ACM 28381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Senior Airman Ryder was found guilty, despite his pleas, of a violation of Article 124, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 924. He maimed JB by striking her in the left eye with his fist. Four days later, the eye was surgically removed.

Before us, Ryder raises various matters. We find no reversible error and affirm.

Uncharged Misconduct

Ryder claims that the military judge erred by admitting, over defense objection, evidence of his prior uncharged assault on JB. The evidence was prof erred under Mil. R.Evid. 404(b) to show Ryder’s intent and the absence of self-defense. The military…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. SawyerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. HicksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. ToroU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API