Legal Opinion

American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 9, 1955No. C. D. 1735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These are protests against the collector’s assessment of duty on the cost of dunnage and other items of material and labor at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under section 466 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as the cost of equipments purchased or repairs made in a foreign country upon vessels documented under the laws of the United States to engage in the foreign or coasting trade. It is claimed that these items are not dutiable under said section, which reads as follows:

SEC. 466. EQUIPMENT AND REPAIRS OE VESSELS.

Sections 3114 and 3115 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Metzler v. ThyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. King v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Child v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Protest 815545-G of Pacific & Atlantic Steamship Co.United States Customs Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Northern Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API