Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Boe, Judge:
The above-entitled action has been submitted to this court by the respective parties pursuant to a stipulation of fact and submission filed under date of May 31, 1979. In said document it is specifically provided:
It is further agreed and stipulated by and between counsel for Braniff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that:
This case be submitted on the pleadings heretofore filed in this case and this stipulation; * * *.
The question of law presented by the parties entailed whether a manufacturer’s negotiated warranty with respect to certain aircraft *12made in and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Melo-Sonics Corporation and Southwest Oil Corporation v. David Cropp, Chalmers C. Jordan, Robert W. Lingo and Glass-Tite Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shell Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980