Protest 815545-G of Pacific & Atlantic Steamship Co.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
The merchandise in question here consists of dunnage mats, 3 feet wide and 5 feet long, composed of straw. Duty was assessed thereon by the collector at 50 percent ad valorem under section 466 of the Tariff Act of *7621930, as equipment of vessels. The plaintiff claims that the assessment of duty is illegal because the mats are not imported articles, nor are they articles falling within the terms “equipments . * * * repair parts or materials to be used” as specified in section 466. The plaintiff further relies upon the claims that if said mats are dutiable under section 466,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southwestern Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Otte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibbs v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- States Marine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.