Legal Opinion

Dickstein v. Williams

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1977No. 8974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an injunction restraining the appellants, who were the defendants below, from continuing construction of an addition to their home and ordering removal of the completed construction, which the court found violated the deed restrictions covering the property.

1. The Facts.

Appellants, Martin Dickstein and Richard Palcanis, and all the respondents were residents and property owners in the Prospect Hill Subdivision north of Reno. Each lot in the subdivision was subject to the following deed restriction:

ARTICLE 111: USE

1. No portion of said property shall be used…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  3. ARCHAMBAULT v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. King v. KuglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Meredith v. Washoe County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Trident Construction Corp. v. West Electric, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gladstone v. GregoryNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Satterfield v. Sunny Day Resources, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hiner v. HoffmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API