Legal Opinion

Ard v. State Ex Rel. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1967No. H-229PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice:

Arthur Lee Ard, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, a writ -of habeas corpus. The Attorney General of Arizona has filed a response and we have elected to treat the petition as one for habeas corpus.

As the facts are not in dispute and this case concerns a matter of law which is of some concern to the judiciary of this state, the reasons for our issuance of the writ are set forth in the following opinion.. Petitioner appeared before the Pima County Superior Court in February of 1960 and pleaded guilty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  2. S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People v. WestbrookIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Venson Lane Myers v. Eddie S. Ylst, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API