Legal Opinion
Johnson v. McCord
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 6, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.
The only question raised by the one assignment of error on this appeal-in-error is whether it affirmatively appears from a review of the entire record that the misconduct of the two jurors affected the verdict or results of the trial?
Unless it so appears, there may be no reversal in view of Chapter 32, Acts of 1911, Code Section 10654.
Miss Prances Johnson sued Homer 0. McCord for damages for personal injury and damages to her automobile arising out of a collision between her car and that of McCord, who filed a cross-declaration against her for like damages.
Each alleged that the other was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Thomason v. TrenthamTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Irvine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Sreet Railroad & Tel. Companies v. SimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Hime v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
- Management Services, Inc. v. HellmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
- City of Columbia v. LentzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
- Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.