Legal Opinion

Dale v. Simon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1923No. 1395. [fn*]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

Appellees, U. M. Simon and Dan Brown, brought this suit against appellants, J. E. Dale, J. T. Dale, and the heirs of J. B. Dale, now deceased, to recover back $22,000 alleged to have been paid by ap-pellees to appellants under such stress, advantage, and coercion as amounted to duress of property, or moral duress, alleging that appellants had leased to appellees' for development for oil and gas a tract of 22,000 acres of land in Clay and Archer counties, in this state, and pleading the provisions of said lease contract, and setting out a copy thereof of date May 29, 1919, and by provision and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Pye v. CardwellTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Gillespie v. Fulton Oil & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Johnson v. King & DavidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dale v. SimonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Peques v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Field v. Natl. City Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Kidd v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Ottawa County Nat. Bank v. BouldinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API