Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blackwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 96-2789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. In a case decided this same day, we suspended an attorney for one year with six months stayed because he practiced after having been suspended. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bancsi (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 392, 683 N.E.2d 1072. In Bancsi, the attorney was originally suspended for failing to meet the substance abuse component of his CLE requirement and continuing to represent clients during the five-week period before his pending reinstatement motion was granted.

In this case respondent not only continued to practice law after having been suspended for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. ThorpeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. ChristensenOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. TrollerOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeehanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. SeabrookOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API