Legal Opinion
United States v. Dean J. Lisinski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 1984No. 83-1504PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Senior District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Dean J. Lisinski appeals his conviction of two counts of extortion and one count of attempted extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1976). Lisinski raises three issues for our consideration:
I) Whether the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to sustain the extortion conviction;
II) Whether the evidence at trial imper-missibly amended the indictment;
III) Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Lisinski’s requests for the disclosure of grand jury material?
For the reasons stated below, we Affirm…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Daniel L. BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thomas GaliffaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kimberly A. Sutherland v. Paul R. O'Malley and O'Malley & O'malley, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Sanchez v. Triple-S Management, Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.