Legal Opinion

In re A.H.B.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1985No. 84-538PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent on a charge of robbery, in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2901 (1981).1 The government’s case in chief consisted entirely of the testimony of two children, Anton and Crystal Wormley, who were eleven and eight years old, respectively, at the time of trial. Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that these children were competent witnesses. We find no merit in his challenge and affirm the adjudication of delinquency.

I

One afternoon in February 1984, Anton and Crystal Wormley were sent by their mother to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Henry W. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Easton v. City of BoulderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Stack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API