Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 26, 1969No. 33092-33094_1PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge:

On March 27,1968, the appellants were indicted in New Haven, Connecticut, in a four-count indictment, charging them with wilfully and knowingly attempting to and actually obstructing, delaying and affecting interstate commerce and the movement of supplies from outside Connecticut by extorting and attempting to extort property from certain refuse removal dealers by the wrongful use of threatened force, violence and fear, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951. 1 Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the indiet ment charged substantive violations of the Hobbs Act, while Count…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Women's Medical Professional Corporation Martin Haskell, M.D. v. J. Nick Baird, M.D., Director of Ohio Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Herbert SperlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API