Legal Opinion

Troy W. Ott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1998No. 96-36168PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayer Troy Ott appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States in Ott’s action seeking a refund for tax year 1986. The district court concluded that Ott’s action was time-barred because Ott had “paid” his tax when he submitted a remittance with his request for an automatic extension of time to file his return. The issue is therefore whether a remittance accompanying Treasury Form 4868 constitutes a payment rather than a deposit for purposes of the statute of limitations on a claim for refund. This court has not previously addressed the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Arthur C. Ewing A/K/A A. Clifford Ewing Maxine H. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation, Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Thomas v. Mercantile Nat. Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. David F. Ertman and Jane Ertman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Bonilla v. Las Vegas Cigar Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1999
  3. Boensel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. William K. Vancanagan, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ford Bovey, and Sharon Bovey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Danoff v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API