Legal Opinion
In the Interest of J.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 8, 2001No. 01-99-00875-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
This is a parental rights case. Following a jury trial, the trial court entered a judgment on May 19,1999, terminating the parents’ rights to their son, J.H. The mother, Charlene Bauter, appeals that judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting testimony by a caseworker, and that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the termination.1
The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) asserts that we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because the trial court had no jurisdiction when it signed the appealed-from judgment.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Faulkner v. CulverTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Thorpe v. Volkert, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Estate of Townes v. Wood, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Founders Acquisition & Merger, Inc. v. Susan Penny, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Founders Acquisition & Merger, Inc. v. Susan Penny, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- In Re JH, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- John Reed, Jr. v. Farmers Insurance Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- in Re Gary Brye and William Sala, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007