People v. Blanchard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Defendant Hezekiah Albert Blanchard appeals from a final judgment following a guilty plea and petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. We have consolidated these proceedings, as they both raise the same issues.
Blanchard contends the court lost jurisdiction in this case because his probation officer failed to report his incarceration for a subsequent offense as required by Penal Code 1 section 1203.2a and, therefore, his sentence is void. Blanchard additionally contends he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial by an inordinate delay in sentencing. We affirm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hayes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. MadrigalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Davis v. West Valley Detention CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. SinayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.