Legal Opinion

Dantine v. Shores

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 17, 2011No. 20110665-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*189DECISION

2Per curiam

T1 Darlene Joy Dantine and Gerald Patterson appeal orders granting summary judgment in favor of Steve Gregory Shores and Mary Shores, holding Dantine in contempt of court, and awarding attorney fees and costs as a sanction against Dantine. The underlying case originated with a complaint for damages and punitive damages filed by Dantine and Patterson.1 This case is before the court on the Shoreses' motions for summary disposition and for attorney fees and on our sua sponte motion for summary disposition.

The Shoreses' requests for admission served separately upon Dantine and Patterson…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MeadUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Langeland v. Monarch Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Barnes v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. MiglioreCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Austin v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API