Legal Opinion

Langeland v. Monarch Motors, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1998No. 950454PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Emil Langeland seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s order allowing defendant Monarch Motors, Inc., to amend or withdraw its answers to requests for admission that' Langeland served on Monarch and that were deemed admitted by Monarch when it failed to timely respond to the requests.1

FACTS

In 1992, Emil Langeland bought a used ,1991. model Porsche convertible automobile from Monarch for $30,750. He alleges that defendant J.L. Llavina, a manager at Monarch,, told him that the car had suffered only light body damage which could be repaired for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Rainbolt v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Pixton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Jordan Construction, Inc. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. LeleaeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API